WMA12/01 Oct 2024, Question 11: Proof by Exhaustion and Counter-example
Pearson Edexcel International AS Level Mathematics · Pure Mathematics 2 (WMA12) · Calculator · 6 marks
The question, in short
Show the prime claim fails using a counter example, then prove by exhaustion that m² − 1 is divisible by 3 when integer m is not a multiple of 3.
Summarised in our own words. Use the official paper for the exact wording and any diagrams.
Part (i) · 2 marks
Give one prime value of n for which 3ⁿ + 2 is not prime, showing the resulting number is composite.
- 1Try the prime n = 5
- 23⁵ + 2 = 243 + 2 = 245
- 3245 = 5 × 49, so 245 is not prime
- 4So the statement is false
AnswerCounter-example: n = 5 is prime but 3⁵ + 2 = 245 = 5 × 49 is not prime, so the statement is false
Part (ii) · 4 marks
Consider the two cases of m not divisible by 3, showing in each that m² − 1 is divisible by 3.
- 1If m is not divisible by 3, then m = 3k + 1 or m = 3k + 2 for some integer k
- 2m = 3k + 1: m² − 1 = 9k² + 6k + 1 − 1 = 9k² + 6k = 3(3k² + 2k)
- 3m = 3k + 2: m² − 1 = 9k² + 12k + 4 − 1 = 9k² + 12k + 3 = 3(3k² + 4k + 1)
- 4Both are multiples of 3, so m² − 1 is divisible by 3 whenever m is not divisible by 3
AnswerShown: m = 3k + 1 gives m² − 1 = 3(3k² + 2k); m = 3k + 2 gives m² − 1 = 3(3k² + 4k + 1); both are multiples of 3
Stuck on a step? Read the free lesson: Proof by Exhaustion and Counter-example
Practise more proof by exhaustion and counter-example questions
Real XMA01 past-paper questions, marked on your working like the exam, with a worked solution for every part.
Practise free on LemmaraMore past-paper questions on proof by exhaustion and counter-example
Also searched as: WMA12 October 2024 · WMA12/01 · wma12 oct24 · IAS Maths Pure Mathematics 2 October 2024 · question 11.
Lemmara is an independent study tool, not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel. The worked solutions are Lemmara’s own.